Review Note
Last Update: 03/08/2024 03:37 PM
Current Deck: Crim
PublishedCurrently Published Content
Text
Omissions
- Failure to act or absence of an act
- {{c1::MPC 2.01(3)}}
- Liability for commission of offense can’t be based on omission without action unless:
- {{c2::(1) expressly made sufficient by law defining offense;}} or
- {{c2::(2) Duty to perform omitted act is otherwise imposed by law}}
- Common Law: 5 situations that can impose legal duties
- {{c3::Statutory Duty}}
- {{c3::Status Relationship}}
- Ex: parent-child, employer-employee, spouses to each other, owner-customer, inn keeper-guest, captain-passenger
- {{c3::Assumed Contractual Duty to Care for Another}}
- Ex: lifeguard-swimmier, babysitter-child
- Case: {{c4::Commonwealth v. Pesttinikas}}
- {{c5::Couple orally agreed to care for Clye in exchange for money
- Failed to care for him
- Court recognized oral contract as conferring duty onto defendants}}
- Rule: {{c6::where parties contracted to care for life of victim in providing food & medical services but fails to do so leading to death, omission was contractual agreement & duty to act was present}}
- {{c3::Defendant created peril}}
- {{c3::Voluntarily assumed care & secluded helpless person to prevent others from assisting}}
- Bystanders
- Common Law
- No general legal obligation to intervene or stop crime unless:
- {{c7::There is already an existing duty to act or}}
- {{c7::They encourage, incite or assist crime}}
- Transforms them from bystanders to co-accomplices/conspirators
- Case: {{c8::State v. Davis}}
- {{c9::Girl raped in defendants home by defendants son
- Court recognized defendant wasn’t merely unconnected passive bystander but acted sufficiently to establish culpability -> chargeable for actions of son}}
- Rule: {{c10::Where defendant’s presence facilitated & encouraged perpetrators actions, they too may be held liable in lesser degree}}
- {{c11::NOT A THING}} UNDER MPC
Back Extra
No published tags.
Pending Suggestions
No pending suggestions for this note.